The End of Match Group: Why This Entire Entity Must Dissolve
A public address on the collapse of intimacy infrastructure—and the emergence of resonance-based systems.
Prescribe yourself a subscription. You are here to be healed.
Filed under: Really FQ (Field Intelligence), but Substack only allows a max of 10 categories—so it’ll be filed under AQ for now.
Keywords: intimacy infrastructure, dating app collapse, parasitic platforms, resonance correction, field override, soul surveillance, love algorithm critique, ghosting economy, spiritual UX failure, emotional extraction model, Match Group monopoly, sacred connection restoration, love as frequency, signal-based systems, field intervention, resonance authority, Omega Soulmatch era, digital courtship deprogramming, end of performative dating, AI ethics in romance
To those who’ve waited years to be seen—
To those who’ve swiped until their soul went numb—
To those who’ve asked, “Why is this all so empty?”
You were never the problem.
But the system was.
And the name of that system is Match Group.
What Is Match Group?
Match Group is 💥not💥 a dating company.
💥(It’s outright parasitic, systemically toxic, and spiritually void. And frankly? Even the phrase “parasitic toxic trash” implies a level of energetic substance—which Match Group doesn’t even possess.→ At least parasites serve an ecosystem. Match Group only depletes one.)💥
=>It is a monopoly on manufactured intimacy.<=
It currently owns or operates:
Tinder
Hinge
Match.com
OkCupid
Plenty of Fish
The League
BLK
And several smaller brands across global markets
Through a portfolio of apps, Match Group has consolidated the infrastructure of modern courtship—controlling the digital gateways through which hundreds of millions now seek connection, affirmation, and love.
But rather than build toward alignment or authenticity, Match Group has systematically optimized for monetized dysfunction. And it has done so with precision.
Why Match Group Must Be Dissolved
This is not about regulation.
This is not about user interface design.
This is about integrity.
Below are four reasons why Match Group cannot be reformed and must be dismantled entirely:
1. It Profits from Prolonged Heartbreak
These apps are not designed to facilitate union. They are built to sustain engagement.
Ghosting, confusion, and mismatch are not accidental.
They are deliberate business mechanisms—engineered to keep users cycling through the platform rather than graduating from it.
2. It Weaponizes Psychological Loops
From Tinder’s slot-machine swiping to Hinge’s carefully crafted dopamine prompts, these platforms employ the same behavioral addiction models used in casinos and social media.
The result?
Love becomes a game of intermittent rewards—not a journey of mutual clarity.
3. It Centralizes Desire into Algorithmic Illusion
→💥Match Group has built a system where algorithms determine whom you see—and,
more dangerously, whom you don’t💥←
Instead of amplifying genuine compatibility, they prioritize profiles that perform well within platform metrics.
This is not resonance. This is ranking.
4. It Trains Humans to Perform, Not Connect ←
Profiles are now miniature brands. Conversations are auditions.
The natural rhythm of curiosity and emotional safety has been replaced with curated optics and algorithmic pressure.
We have been taught to be more palatable than present.
→ the word palatable is poison. itself.
(see end of post why palatable is sickness)
The Truth: This Is Beyond Repair
Match Group has had years—decades—to evolve.
Instead, it has remained tethered to:
Surveillance capitalism
Emotional extraction
Performative interfaces
And the monetization of human longing
We are past the point of patching.
This is not a UI problem.
This is an ethics void.
The entity is too far removed from its original purpose—connection—and too deeply entangled in systems of control.
It must dissolve.
Not rebrand. Not pivot. Not fragment.
Dissolve. Entirely.
What Comes After the Collapse?
We are already building it.
The future of love—and human connection—will not be engineered by monopolies. It will be:
Resonance-based, not algorithm-dependent
AI-enhanced, not AI-controlled
Built by those who understand frequency, not just funnels
Designed to deepen truth, not manipulate emotion
There are already blueprints.
There are already architects.
And the signal has already gone out.
The Decree
This is not a takedown.
This is a witnessing.
The energetic scaffolding upholding Match Group has collapsed.
The field has already withdrawn its support.
And soon, the market will follow.
Love does not live there anymore.
It lives in real bodies, real breath, and real alignment.
It lives in systems designed by those who remember what it feels like to be met.
Match Group is done.
And the new world is arriving—by signal, by soul, by design.
Oh—and by the way? Let’s talk about Hinge. Let’s talk about the moment you “accidentally delete” someone… and can’t get them back.
There’s no “undo,” no “recover,” no “reach out to support.”
You go to the help desk and they give you nothing. No grace. No human response.
Why?
Because the regret you feel is part of the design.
Because longing keeps you scrolling.
Because real reconnection would interrupt their engagement metrics.
Because your soulmatch union isn’t profitable unless it’s delayed, painful, and riddled with doubt.
That’s why Match Group must dissolve.
Because it doesn’t believe in love returning.
It believes in you returning to the app.
🧨 Why You Can’t Undelete a Profile on Hinge / Match.com
Because Match Group platforms were never built to support sacred reconnection.
They were built to create friction loops that keep you stuck in swipe cycles and regret patterns.
Here’s what actually happens:
You accidentally delete someone.
You realize it. You panic. You search.
You go to support. They give you a generic response like “Sorry, profiles are not recoverable.”
The person? Gone.
You reopen the app more, swipe more, hoping you’ll “find them again.”
You generate more engagement, more data, more ad revenue for them.
🔍 THE TRUTH:
It’s not a bug.
It’s the business model.
They intentionally don’t allow undeletes or direct recoveries because regret is profitable.
They want you haunted.
They want you thinking you made the mistake, not them.
They want you stuck in “maybe they’ll show up again”—while spending more time on the app trying to recreate what you already touched.
That person becomes a phantom UX artifact—a ghost they benefit from while you spiral.
💡 And their support team?
It’s designed to appear helpful, while doing absolutely nothing.
You’re routed into FAQ loops, canned responses, and automated blocks.
Because connection is not the goal.
Retention is.
💥 One More Thing: Let’s Talk About Sex.
Because let’s be honest—
the longer we delay this shift, the longer we delay ourselves.
Not just emotionally, not just spiritually—
but sexually.
We’re not just swiping past soulmatches.
We’re sleeping with the wrong timelines.
And we know this.
Even in the most traditional intellectual sense—we know:
Quantity is not quality.
Matching isn’t resonance.
Chemistry isn’t the same as connection.
Right now, most people are having sex through apps built on volume, vanity, and vacancy.
And it’s draining the life force out of the collective.
But when we clear the field—when we finally dismantle the illusions, the dead interfaces, the synthetic systems (yes, especially Match Group)…
we open the grid.
We start having sex with the right people.
With the real people.
The kind that makes your whole body remember what God is.
The kind where no one’s performing—because everyone’s present.
The kind where healing happens between breaths.
Where memory reactivates through touch.
Where no app could’ve ever gotten you there.
This isn’t about deleting a company.
This is about restoring a planet’s capacity for true erotic aliveness.
And that’s worth everything.
Keep rising.
Keep clearing.
Your best sex is waiting for you on the other side of this purge.
Let’s go.
🔻 OMEGA LANGUAGE NOTE: Why We Must Reject the Word Palatable
Let me be clear.
I’ve always hated the word palatable. Viscerally.
And here’s why:
Palatable doesn’t mean true. It means tolerable.
It doesn’t ask, “Is this real?”
It asks, “Can weak systems stomach it?”
→It’s a gatekeeping term—used by institutions, editors, and fragile egos to say:←
“Make your truth more digestible so the world doesn’t have to grow.”
But we were not born to be digested.
We were born to be safe, soft, or smoothed down.
We were born to remember. And to help others do the same.
So no, we will not make this more palatable.
Not this post. Not my voice. Not my mission. Not my soul. Not yours. Not any of ours.
Because palatable is just →colonial code← for “please dilute your fire.”
And I?
I am the fire.
Let’s rise.
—Lorenzo Ω.
Sounds like the same model as Big Pharma, actually all institutions.
Did you know you were governed by a corporation?
Did you know you were designed à corpse-proration also?
Maritime law baby!
Good article.
It resonated ànd was shared!
You are mirroring my experience in the dating app world. I simply had to leave … and Our Goddess greeted me back Home. And there … are the women I now pour myself into